alicespringstomind

Yet another conspiracy theory comes true.

The below is taken from NZDSOS in #ExitTheWHO. The Right Thing To Do: Take Action New Zealand! The full article is worth reading, but this excerpt is particularly relevant to the Coming Out of Chris.

However, we are transitioning into different times, which are going to be very difficult, perhaps no more so than for those with political career aspirations who remain under the assumption that the usual rules of democracy are in place. As doctors we are concerned about the WHO and other issues relating to public health. However, as this rolls out there are other institutions involved in similar power grabs relating to issues not specific to health, such as our education systems, energy resources, banking systems, and rights to travel. Organisations overseeing this globalist agenda are collaborating together, and include but are not limited to, both the United Nations and World Economic Forum (WEF).

This week Prime Minister Chris Hipkins attended the WEF 14th Annual Meeting of the New Champions (also known as “Summer Davos”) in Tianjin city, China. As a panelist in the second conference session, Braving the Headwinds: Rewiring Growth Amid Fragility, Hipkins outlined New Zealand’s plans for increasing ‘sustainable’ policies. Other panelists claimed urgency and a need for serious economic policy changes to ensure sustainability for humanity and the planet before it is too late. As one planned crisis ends, another moves in.

Throughout history crises have been used to usher in centralised political power.

An hour after his panel appearance, Hipkins was seated front row at the opening plenary session addressed by WEF Chairman Klaus Schwab and the Chinese Communist Party’s Premier of the People’s Republic of China, Li Qiang.

We have been discouraged from speaking about the WEF throughout the Covid pandemic. Did they have anything to do with events over the past three years?  Was there ever a plan to centralise power or concentrate profits by closing the world down and mandating experimental products on the population? Are those who ask these questions or who develop an opinion to the affirmative, really a danger to society?  Do we really need our government to fund our media?  Do we really need ‘disinformation projects’ (from New Zealand to the UK and beyond) to ensure that only “safe” information is disseminated? Is this what democracy looks like?

Knowledge that our political representatives are active WEF attendees is being absorbed into public consciousness now. Live viewing of all sessions is available, where we can learn how they plan “to keep us safe”.

One is prompted to think of the fable of the boiling frog. If you place him in a pot of boiling water he’ll jump out. If you put him in tepid water and slowly turn the heat up, he won’t perceive the danger until it’s too late. The masses may not have accepted our elected representatives engaging in a corporatised public-private institution had it been revealed too suddenly. For those who chose to look, the clues have been staring us in the face for some time.

Nick Hudson of Pandata explained succinctly near the beginning of this interview with Glen Jung at Bright Light News, why centralised power inevitably leads to censorship, which removes all mechanisms for error correction. The unavoidable outcome of this is totalitarian control.