From the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society, this book is a long and detailed read. Below is the Conclusion at the end of the book, and a copy of the entire book for those interested.
This book has been assembled by an aggregation of highly-qualified and experienced doctors and researchers who take their ethics seriously. Here, information has not been withheld, or, worse, blocked.
In a letter to AMPS, in January of 2023, the then-Australian Secretary of the Department of Health and Aged Care, Brendan Murphy, wrote: ‘Regarding excess mortality statistics, there is no credible evidence to suggest that excess mortality is related to COVID-19 vaccination either in Australia or internationally. The Actuaries Institute’s COVID-19 Mortality Working Group are independently publishing regular analysis of excess deaths. The Working Group have concluded that vaccination impacts on excess mortality are negligible and do not fit with the timing or shape of excess mortality.’ It is very telling that Murphy thereby skirts the issue. If the excess mortality rates are not being grossly raised by the mRNA injections, what are they being raised by? Would not this be the central concern? Or is denial more important?
‘No credible evidence….’ These are very peculiar words. On the day this book was launched, AMPS had access to well over three thousand five hundred studies casting extreme doubt on the integrity of the COVID-19 injections, and pointing to untold damage from them. All of these studies have been written by highly-qualified people; only a few of them could be selected for this book. They offer vast scientific evidence about the inappropriateness, the damage and the danger found in the Australian government’s slavish adaptation and succumbing to what can be distilled into the demands of the world’s biggest pharmaceutical companies. Drug-company medicine has overtaken the medical institutions, and rammed its methods home to the point where those students trained in them are finally ejected into practice
believing in pharmaceutical products to the extent of religious evangelism. The money expended in purchase and disbursement of these products, now shown never to have worked, has crippled economies worldwide as it has passed to the drug companies.
‘No credible evidence’?
For three years Australia succumbed to the will of corporate ideologues in big pharma, big media, big finance, and big government who seem to prioritise profit over people. This enslavement, and it is nothing less, may help to explain these high excess death rates being witnessed now at more than 15 per cent above baseline mortality. Put another way, AMPS and all ethical and informed doctors are horrified at the ten or twenty or thirty thousand excess deaths in this country in the time since March, 2021. Australian and other Western data show a mass casualty event; peculiarly, the higher figures are occurring in the countries that are highly injected, but our political and medical authorities seem to think there is nothing worth scrutiny. Now, with this book, it has been probed. This investigation has had to cut straight across the lockstep media messaging, the medical misinformation and the censorship.
Big pharma has created a fine business model for itself, but what has been the cost to humanity? Until Australia’s policymakers become more aware of the influence of big pharma and the technological big food and private industrial complex, policies will continue to reflect decisions not grounded in medical thinking. Big pharma ought not to be allowed to continue funding medical journals and university chairs because the end result of this is high profit combined with weak medicine. Considering the criminal records and the level of penalties (in the form of extraordinary fines) on multinational drug companies, the TGA needs to focus on the integrity of the drug companies. Their databases accordingly need to be transparent. Is a peak body of pharmacovigilance called for?
In the presence of unprecedented death rates and adverse reactions, and the ignoring of safety signals, why has the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the body meant to stand guard, not withdrawn the COVID vaccines, pending a full investigation? It defies logic. Is this wilful blindness?
Australians have endured relentless psychological manipulation through media and propaganda, misinformation from authorities, and medical censorship designed to create an illusion of consensus by our own government and authorities entrusted with our protection. It became obvious quickly that
this was not about ‘following the science’ or ‘keeping people safe’. It was about the establishment and the enforcement at any cost of a system imposed from above by people misusing their authority. The nation has been through dark times and there now needs to be an accounting.
Australian people were tracked, traced, quarantined, shamed, and finally threatened into submitting to a vaccination-only strategy. On the streets to protest they were shot with rubber bullets. Governmental figures have shown how these gene-based pharmaceuticals were ineffective from the start. Now the health system continues to advocate perpetual boosters, which in themselves and by their repetition show how incompetent the novel vaccine platform is in the protection of patients from contracting COVID. The public health system appears to have been used against a trusting population for what seems financial benefit in terms of corporate profits, and all with the assistance of misinformed politicians. Australians have a right to feel violated. If medical regulators believe their job is primarily to protect the government public health messaging rather than to protect the public then the corruption of medicine is complete.
The Australian Medical Professionals Society is joining hands with more and more of the likeminded, people who believe in first doing no harm, in having informed valid voluntary consent, and protecting bodily autonomy in accordance with the longest-standing principles of civilized medical practice. We believe medicine in Australia exists to serve the people, and it should never be as it is now, the other way around.
The Australian Health Practitioner Registration Agency (AHPRA) has many perceived negatives and has demonstrated no adequate ability for oversight, as this book has amply shown. If it continues to exist then that should be solely as a registering body. This of course cannot be said by individual practitioners
who see through the holes in the present system, because the system will immediately punish them and so they will be suspended. Practitioners must regain the right to speak freely, for this reason, and also to be able to call out research fraud.
Regulatory agencies should not be in a position to take money from the big pharmaceutical companies. Australian people need protection from predatory corporate bodies, those in pharmaceuticals, in food and in agriculture. In particular, AMPS finds that the regulators’ job is to assess the information presented by vested interests. Data have to be released, and need to be open-sourced in the raw form to independent researchers. Otherwise, censorship is too easily applied, to the detriment of the facts.
This present book is finding its way to medical and political authorities both in Australia and overseas. The introduction to the book ended with a quotation from Winston Churchill. The Australian Medical Professionals Society has every intention of driving forward this debate to the point of prompting
substantial governmental action to rectify serious problems within our health system, and it may be appropriate to finish with another. ‘Now, this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.’
Read the entire book, here: