Andrew Bridgen MP, one of the only people in the House of Commons with a science degree, has been calling on the UK parliament to halt the Covid-19 vaccines. This is his 20 minute speech to the House of Commons debate on excess deaths, on 18 April 2024. He articulates concerns about the vaccines including but not limited to, the unknown duration of spike protein manufacture by the cells of vaccine recipients, causing immune system dysfunction leading to auto-immune diseases and cancers.
As you can see, a handful of MPs are present for the debate, quite the opposite to the same room when debating for a rise in their own pay.
As you can hear, the mezzanine public gallery is crowded. Do UK members of parliament represent their constituents anymore? Or do they represent powers elsewhere?
In his speech, Bridgen makes reference to the fact that the president of the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), the UK pharmaceutical regulatory agency, is also the country president of Pfizer UK.
He also references Australia’s shocking rise in excess deaths and inexplicably overwhelmed hospitals with “heart attacks, chest pains and trouble breathing”, since the vaccine rollout in 2021. He also speaks about Dr Robert Tindle’s recent report, published in the Australian Journal of General Practice on 4 April 2024.
“The deaths thus far have been predominantly cardiac. But there may be many more deaths to come unfortunately … from these novel treatments. And that is from inducing extra cancer deaths.”
Lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines concentrate coding for a foreign protein in the ovaries of female vaccine recipients. This creates an immune reaction against the ovaries as they express the foreign protein.
Officials in Alberta Canada are now recommending these products to be administered to infants as young as six months old, in a schedule of two doses, 8 weeks to 3 months apart.
Why would authorities make such a dangerous decision? Conflicts of interest are one explanation. Powerful ideologies are another.
Laura Aboli started her career in 2000 by co-founding World-Check, a risk identification database, and later Wealth-X in 2010, focusing on ultra-wealthy individuals.
After leaving both by 2014, she pursued her passion for interior design with her own company.
With interests in art and a critical view on metaphysics and psychology, she founded the United Democratic International Movement for Awareness and Freedom (UDIMAF) in May 2020, aiming to address the impacts of the global ‘pandemic‘ on society.
She introduces and connects the ideologies of transhumanism and eugenics in this interview (short clip below) with Jeremy Nell, podcaster on Jerm Warfare. She refers to the Club of Rome’s 1972 publication The Limits to Growth, authored by well funded academics following eugenicist ideology relating to claims of limited resources requiring population control measures.
The Limits to Growth authors used mathematical forecasting on a primitive computer to “prove” their claims. The practice of funding academics using computerised mathematical models in order to provide “evidence” of planetary threats has since been modernised and used in modern day propaganda. Most famously is Professor Neil Ferguson from Imperial College London, but there are many others, particularly in the fields of virology and climate change science, where financial and reputational incentives come from billionaire sponsors, many of whom have Club of Rome or other “secret society” connections.
alicespringstomind 