Safety Concerns of mRNA Vaccines Finally Gaining International Traction

Professor Charlotte Kuperwasser and Professor Wafik El Deiry gave this succinct presentation to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices yesterday. They briefly outline the concerns that many informed individuals and groups have been trying to alert the world to for years, in the face of aggressive censorship.

The new ACIP committee, now a panel of 12 independent experts replacing the previous committee of pharmaceutical industry connected individuals, has restored the patient-doctor relationship by recommending “shared clinical decision-making” between patients and their doctor. A number of these committee members spoke out from 2020 onwards, against the pseudoscience posing as a pandemic response which caused enormous harm, destroyed public health’s credibility and enriched a few billionaires and their “principal investigator” teams at various institutes, foundations and government departments who surrendered scruples for profit.

This ‘vaccine’ was rushed into distribution from its inception, with a median review time of just 21 days before approval,” said Dr. Joseph Varon, Independent Medical Alliance President and Chief Medical Officer. “There’s now a flood of peer-reviewed research highlighting the dangerous error of this process. This is, by far, the most harmful vaccine ever administered in the US. Today’s move is a victory for patient rights and transparency.

The ACIP committee, members of which include IMA Senior Advisor Dr. Robert Malone and IMA Senior Fellow Dr. Kirk Milhoan, voted unanimously to adopt the updated guidance, emphasizing individual risk-benefit assessments over broad mandates. As key voices on the panel, Dr. Malone and Dr. Milhoan have been instrumental in advocating for evidence-based reforms, drawing on the IMA’s frontline expertise to highlight unresolved safety issues with mRNA technology.

Earlier this week, former CDC Director Susan Monarez faced scrutiny during Senate testimony, smiling smugly whilst offering no substantive answers on why the CDC previously pushed mRNA vaccine mandates on children and healthy adults despite high risks and limited effectiveness against COVID-19 transmission. She was also questioned about the CDC’s handling of 780,000 V-Safe injury reports withheld from the public.

Meanwhile in Tokyo, another press conference was held by the Japan Vaccine Issues Research Association (JVIRA) on 18 September, led by Professor Masanori Fukushima—an oncologist, pharmacoepidemiologist, and pioneer in Japan’s drug safety education. This time, in a pivotal change, officials from Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) attended and listened to the concerns of these leading scientists who have – until now at least – faced dire censorship.

Drawing on their English article Regulatory and Safety Assessment of COVID-19 mRNA-LNP Genetic Vaccines in Japan: Evidence for Revocation of Approval and Market Withdrawal, Professor Fukushima and colleagues insist upon the immediate cancellation of approval and market recall of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and their lipid nanoparticle formulations. They presented compelling evidence that these injectables were mishandled during approval, treated as conventional shots when they are, in essence, groundbreaking gene therapies with unpredictable consequences.


Leave a comment