Professor Dalgleish is Professor of Oncology at St George’s University of London, a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of the UK and Australia, the Academy of Medical Sciences, and the Royal College of Pathologists. He is co-discoverer of the fact that HIV uses CD4 as a cell receptor in humans. As an oncologist, his main focus has been on developing immunotherapies to treat cancer.
Dystopian world of the preening vaccine-mongers
Professor Angus Dalgleish, 31 March 2023
WHY are the government still charging ahead with spring and summer booster Covid vaccines with absolutely no scientific justification?
Last week I applied to attend a Policy Exchange forum on ‘What is the future for vaccines policy?’ with speakers from the UK Health Security Agency (Dame Jenny Harries), Government (former Health Secretary Sajid Javid MP) the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (Thorrun Govind) and the British pharmaceutical industry Susan Rienow), who also happens to be UK president for Pfizer. The Policy Exchange is the ‘conservative’ think tank which published A Fresh Shot, The Future of Vaccines Policy in England in December 2022.
I was eager to hear if any revelations were going to be discussed. My application was initially accepted, but after I filled in all my details they must have had second thoughts and the next day I was informed that the event was oversubscribed and I would not be able to attend in person. I was, however, given a link to watch online, where I observed many empty seats.
The event was by our current dystopian standards quite extraordinary with unbelievable self-congratulatory speeches by all confirming the brilliance of the Covid vaccine programme, the plans for spring and summer boosters and how this will be applied to all future threats.
The five people who were allowed to ask questions were all graduates from the Uriah Heep school of obsequiousness.
There were no facts, no mention of the side effects, no seeking any justification for this mass psychotic madness.
Jenny Harries spoke with a strange supercilious detachment from reality, never once addressing any negative aspects in spite of the Yellow Card data and statistics of which she must be aware. Susan Rienow reacted like a cartoon figure with dollar signs where her eyes should have been.
This confirmed that the UK government and its agencies – including so-called think tanks – are in serious and dangerous denial leading to many deaths by medical negligence (you may argue incompetence but the facts are out there so it is negligence, and as some of the 63,500 deaths last year were a direct result of unnecessary vaccinations it is criminal negligence to boot). They are also wasting billions of pounds when NHS time is desperately needed to help those left physically and mentally impaired by the pandemic, let alone the vaccine injuries.
I have argued strongly before that the boosters are not needed at all as the vaccine is still against the Alpha and Delta variants which have long since left the planet.
There is no crossover protection as the response is one of classic antigenic sin or immunological imprinting. The Omicron variants so beloved of Pfizer and Moderna not only fail to protect from new variants but actively encourage them by Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) which explains why boosted patients are 50 per cent more likely to catch Covid after their vaccination than those who refuse.
I have also pointed out that the booster is worse than no vaccine at all as it induces T-cell suppression and antibody class switching which is why I and my colleagues throughout the world are seeing an explosive rise of cancer relapses in boosted cancer patients. I initially reported my experience in melanoma and lymphoma patients but others are reporting the same in young people with many different types including colorectal, prostate and very rare tumours, often close to the injection site.
I have been admonished for reporting anecdotes and not doing a proper study which no one will fund, so let’s look at the government’s own figures released in October last year and ignored. They show that there are more Yellow Cards for Covid vaccines than all the other vaccines over 50 years. The rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) i.e. those which result in death or serious hospitalisation or severe disability is 1 in 800 for all vaccines, which the MHRA calls ‘very rare’.
So let’s look at the effectiveness, i.e. the number of vaccines required to prevent hospitalisations and severe disease requiring intensive care (ITU). For those aged 50-59 the figures are 43,600 boosters required to prevent one hospitalisation and 256,000 to prevent one ITU admission. But there are 321 in ITU with vaccine injuries! The figures for 40-49 are a ludicrous 932,000 and 92,600, with 1,175 in ITU with vaccine injuries. Remember this is for a virus which at its worst killed patients of an average age of 82.
Last weekend cardiologist Aseem Malhotra and I went to talk to a GP forum in Scotland where we had been warned there would be severe objections to these dangerous lunatics from England. The expected challenges never happened as doctor after doctor thanked us for explaining the science of why so many of their patients’ lives have been ruined by the vaccines.
At least we are starting to bring some hard facts into the indefensible mass Stockholm Syndrome event we have had to endure these last three years.
Other cancer specialists agree with me about vaccine harm, but the authorities still won’t listen
19 December 2022
FOLLOWING my recent communication about my very real concern over the recurrence of cancer in many of my melanoma patients who have been stable for long periods, at least five years and in one case 18 years, other oncologists have contacted me to say they are seeing the same phenomenon.
Seeing the recurrence of these cancers after all this time naturally makes me wonder if there is a common cause? I had previously noted that relapse in stable cancer is often associated with severe long-term stress, such as bankruptcy, divorce, etc. However I found that none of my patients had any such extra stress during this time but they had all had booster vaccines and, indeed, a couple of them noted that they had a very bad reaction to the booster which they did not have to the first two injections.
I then noted that some of these patients were not having a normal pattern of relapse but rather an explosive relapse, with metastases occurring at the same time in several sites. Obviously, I began to wonder whether the booster vaccines could be causing these relapses and were not just coincidence, as my colleagues were willing to suggest.
Within a three-month period I have been able to identify eight people who have developed B-cell malignancies following the booster, with two of them reporting that they instantly felt very unwell after the booster, having had no problem after the first two vaccines, then describing the symptoms of extreme exhaustion and long Covid before being investigated and finding out that they had a B-cell leukaemia in two cases, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in five and a very aggressive myeloma in the other case.
Scientifically, I was reading reports that the booster was leading to a big excess of antibodies at the expense of the T-cell response and that this T-cell suppression could last for three weeks, if not more. To me, this could be causal as the immune system is being asked to make an excessive response through the humoral inflammatory part of the immune response against a virus (the alpha-delta variant) which is no longer in existence in the community. This exertion leads to immune exhaustion, which is why these patients are reporting up to a 50 per cent greater increase in Omicron, or other variations, than the non-vaccinated.
Having communicated these observations I was rapidly reminded that I had written an article, published in the Daily Mail in the middle of 2021, which encouraged people to get vaccinated, particularly younger people. This was a very thorough article, written under my name but essentially conducted by interview, for the purpose of condoning the vaccine rollout at the time. Although I had started to have concerns, the overwhelming push by the Government and the medical community was that this would be in everyone’s best interest. So the environment at that time was completely different to what it is now. Indeed, my own take on this was soon to change very dramatically when my own son developed myocarditis after having a jab he did not want but that he needed for work and travel purposes. I also then found out that one of his friends in his early thirties had suffered a stroke and that a niece of my close colleague had a fatal heart attack at the age of 34, having had the vaccine for her occupation as a nurse! I began to be highly alarmed that it was the vaccines causing these symptoms, and that just as we had written right at the very beginning of the pandemic, a genetically engineered virus had serious implications for vaccine design. This paper, which was suppressed and therefore did not appear in print for many months,* reported that the sequence of the virus was completely consistent with having been genetically engineered, with a furin cleavage site and six inserts at places that would make the virus very infectious, and the reason this had such tremendous implications for vaccine design was that 80 per cent of these sequences had homology to human epitopes. In particular, we had noticed a homology with platelet factor 4 and myelin. The former is also certainly associated with what is known as VITT (low platelets and clotting issues) and the latter associated with all the neurological problems, such as transverse myelitis, both of which are now recognised as side effects of the vaccine even by the MHRA.
Although it took some time to get these findings out into press, they were delivered to and widely circulated to the Cabinet and various medical committees as we thought these observations were crucially important. Unfortunately, they were ignored.
However, the cases of myocarditis did not even need this trigger as young hearts over-express the ACE-receptor, which the virus had been trained in the laboratory to bind to with very high affinity and it is this that sets off the inflammatory response, which leads to myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke and deaths, which it is now clear are far more common in the under-40s than caused by the virus infection itself.
It was also shortly after this time that it became evident that the virus was attenuating, as all viruses do. In addition treatment was improving so the virus was leading to fewer hospitalisations and deaths. I believe this is a very important factor to take into account as it was clear at the end of the first year that the pandemic was reducing and the virus becoming less aggressive, with the emergence of the Omicron variant, just as large sections of the population were being vaccinated.
In late 2021 it was becoming manifestly evident too that the vaccines were anything but safe and effective and that the disease was not nearly as problematic as it was at the beginning of 2020 when it was being rendered much worse with what I believed at the time to be ludicrous responses. These included both lockdown and the refusal to treat Covid as a respiratory airborne virus with consensus mechanisms but instead pushing patients on to a randomised trial, known as RECOVERY, which ended up showing what everyone knew: that if there is an acute inflammation in the lungs patients need dexamethasone. The early responses also included putting patients on ventilation, which now is known to be the last thing that should have been done as it seemed to encourage early death.
When the facts change, or new facts emerge, the position of all those in authority directing mandates should change but unfortunately, they did not.
I tried desperately to point out that all the evidence that vaccines might have been useful in helping to curtail the pandemic was changing; that it was becoming very clear that there were highly significant side effects to the vaccine programme that Pfizer had gone to great lengths to cover up, and that it was only a court case in the US that led to them becoming available. At this stage the whole vaccine programme should have been stopped but nobody seemed to want to address this, neither the Government, the medical authorities or the media.
Having written many articles for the Daily Mail arguing against lockdown and for it never to be used again, I was extremely keen to address my change of opinion on the vaccines and to warn people of their dangers particularly to younger people, and to point out there were no grounds at all for giving it to children. Unfortunately, all my efforts and approaches to the mainstream media on this subject have been rejected. This, I believe, is something that will come back to haunt all those who introduced an Orwellian kind of suppression to the emerging truth, which labelled doctors trying to save their patients along the lines of ‘first do no harm’ as outcasts or villains.
An Accelerated Cancer Catastrophe
NZDSOS, 6 December 2022
Accelerated Cancer : An Emerging Catastrophe
A number of medical specialists are speaking out on the rise in cancer diagnoses following vaccination, especially recurrences in patients previously in remission, and new, unusual and especially rapid cases, being referred to as “turbo cancers”, for example in this article about Swedish pathologist Dr Ute Kruger’s observations and the subsequent threats to her career.
Another outspoken pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, was one of the first to detect the accelerated cancer rates which have been observed since the Covid-19 vaccine rollout. He explains the mechanisms of immune dysfunction thought responsible in this interview.
Pathologists are considered the “quality controllers of medicine”, as they tend to detect patterns of disease in populations early on. Dr Cole references this article by Föhse et al, The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses, which is an analysis of the immune response to Comirnaty providing information on the mechanisms explaining why accelerated cancers might occur at higher rates in Covid-19 inoculated populations. He reports that oncologists across the globe are speaking now, about increasing rates of usually manageable cancers occurring like wildfire and being more aggressive than usual.
Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima of Kyoto University in Japan referenced immune dysregulation in his recent warning of a pending global health disaster. Days ago an online search provided information on Professor Fukushima’s background (biochemistry, clinical medicine, oncology and medical education). Today that information is obscured by results relating to a 16th century warrior, which may not be entirely irrelevant.
We no longer wonder at the motivations of search engines and “fact checking” services. It is obvious their role is to silence anyone not “protecting the vaccine”.
The UK General Medical Council, in keeping with Federation of State Medical Boards tactics, are pursuing oncologists Professor Justin Stebbing of Imperial College London and Professor Karol Sikora of the University of Buckingham Medical School, in a case which reeks of pharmaceutical industry corruption and intimidation. Professor Sikora has been steadfast in his predictions that the pandemic response would lead to accelerated cancers – but due to delayed screening and diagnosis, as well as disruptions to treatment access.
Professor Sikora’s recent article, The lockdown cancer wave has only just begun is testament to the accelerated cancers now being seen in the UK. He is also campaigning against the ongoing closure of four world-class cancer centres, consistent with Dr Bob Gill’s conclusion that the National Health Service is being intentionally demolished by the pharmaceutical industrial complex, for profit.
Another Professor of Oncology, Angus Dalgleish of St George’s at the University of London, has written to the Editor in Chief of the British Medical Journal, expressing his concerns about immune suppression resulting in rare and accelerated cancers. He calls for an end to the vaccine program “given the average age of death of Covid in the UK is 82 and from all other causes is 81 and falling”, before describing various adverse events, including immune-related cancers.
One of Europe’s best-known figures in medical research is Dr Michel Goldman, professor of immunology and pharmacotherapy at the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium. Dr Goldman has gone public with his own personal story of an accelerated cancer which he associates with Covid-19 “vaccination”. He was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma, an immune system cancer, sometime after receiving his second Covid-19 inoculation. Immediately after the diagnosis he rushed to get a third inoculation, believing it was indicated due to immune suppression caused by his cancer.
Within days of this injection being administered, Dr Goldman’s condition worsened and tests showed a rapid proliferation of the cancer. He and his brother, a nuclear medicine specialist, have written a case study encouraging further medical research into the suspected connection between mRNA “vaccines” and T cell lymphoma. Read more here, and hear his story here.
Despite introducing a brand new pharmaceutical product to market in rushed circumstances with numerous manufacturing concerns, Pfizer “assumed” that there was no need to look for potential carcinogenic effects. Those who received the product for whatever reason, along a wide spectrum between faith in the “safe and effective” narrative, to tortuous coercion, are in fact experimental subjects. Pfizer’s Nonclinical Overview trial document released in March 2022 states the following.
New Zealand’s Medsafe Comirnaty (Pfizer) data sheet says the same thing.
Accessed by OIA request, an email dated 21 September 2021 from Dr Tim Hanlon of the MOH Post Event Group, Covid-19 Vaccine and Immunisation Programme, responding to Deputy Chief Coroner Tutton who had requested further information for coroners making decisions relating to post-mortem examination of deceased people following administration of Comirnaty, stated the following. What possible evidence can Dr Hanlon have been referring to?
And note especially the last two sentences. Surely he means SADS? And why has the chief coroner ignored our letter on cases exactly such as these that Dr Hanlon refers to?
Meanwhile, many responsible for implementing what eminent pathologist Dr Roger Hodkinson has described as the most heinous crime against humanity, continue to blame a virus with an infection fatality rate in the same range as seasonal influenza, for their crimes. It is also pertinent to note that a recent meta-analysis shows the IFR to be even less of a risk in those without vaccination aged between 0 – 59 years than previously thought (0.035%).
However, official messaging seeks to blame all other pandemic aspects except the jab for its terrible harms.
The potential consequences of imposing these substances onto unwitting and fearful populations were known. Concerned medical scientists and professionals like NZDSOS have repeatedly drawn attention to possible harms and asked why caution was not used for a disease with a fatality rate similar to the flu.
Relating to cancer in particular, studies appeared early 2020 predicting the C-19 spike protein would turn off vital cancer protective genes, especially the P53 and BRCA genes. Here is a review of some studies on this topic. This lab study created a particular stir for finding abundant spike protein in cell nuclei, and then for it’s frankly suspicious retraction, covered in this fascinating article by computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose.
The ramifications of willful blindness about these injections are becoming glaringly apparent. Accelerated cancer rates are amongst many concerns. Pharma and regulators were warned, refused to engage in the scientific process, and participated in the silencing of dissent, to the detriment of us all.
Resolution to this crisis must include identifying those who coordinated this atrocity and ensuring that they face justice. Protections must also be established to ensure that corporate, politicised, nefarious and criminal interests can never again abrogate human rights, medical science and clinical practice.
Both Benign and Malignant Tumors Following mRNA Vaccination
Dr Chris Flowers is a professor of radiology and cancer specialist, and member of the Daily Clout Pfizer Data Analysis teams. These are 3,500 independent volunteers with relevant qualifications who came forward to analyse the 450,000+ pages of raw data which Pfizer were court-ordered to release. Dr Flowers discusses here, the rapid rise in benign and malignant tumours being seen since 2021, as well as other safety signals clearly associated with the so-called Covid-19 “vaccines”, and the extreme industry-sponsored censorship of this information including from medical journals. “Benign tumours don’t normally kill you, but the problem is some benign tumours can become malignant … now we’ve found … patients presenting initially with a low-grade tumour and suddenly it becomes dysregulated, that means it suddenly becomes very aggressive … this is very very unusual and should be ringing alarm bells in everybody’s brain.“
Hear Professor Dalgleish here: Are Covid Boosters Causing Cancer?
It will be okay though because once more, Pfizer have the solution.
alicespringstomind 