Ever aware of the psychopathic evil that the Epstein class is inflicting upon humanity, NZDSOS looks at the incoming excuse to steal our food – “bird flu” – and wonders at what point people will finally become roused into resistance.
The Suffering and Death of Birds
Do you remember rescuing sick birds as a child? Placing them in a box or a cage, offering them worms and water? Setting them free when they survived or burying them when they did not?
Migratory birds travel vast distances, often across water with no place to land meaning they must fly for prolonged periods of time. Risks include headwinds, storms, predator attacks, exhaustion, dehydration and starvation. High mortality rates can occur, especially for land birds crossing oceans in adverse weather conditions.
Today a sick bird is considered the first step towards another human pandemic. Emergency response teams are activated with PCR tests to identify “cases” and the media publish emotionally charged headlines inferring alarm and fear.
The idea of large scale death caused by bird flu appears to be the brain child of Jeremy Farrar who is now Assistant Director-General, Health Promotion, Disease Prevention and Care, at the World Health Organization. We have written about the history of Sir Jeremy before, highlighting the central role that he played in the 2004 Bird Flu pandemic, alongside Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson – known as Doctor Disaster in the profession for his doom-laden, failed mathematical models. Imperial College’s most notorious modeling fraud is surely the infamous Watson et al paper claiming tens of millions lives saved from the covid jabs.
Contradicting other expert advice, Farrar insisted that a young Vietnamese child who had played with a dead duck before presenting to hospital with vague influenza-like symptoms, had H5N1 avian influenza. Ferguson jumped in with a mathematical model predicting 150 million deaths. Ultimately they only managed to attribute 243 deaths to the virus, which doesn’t add up to a pandemic by anyone’s standards.
In the two decades since then, collaborations between entities closely associated with both Farrar and Ferguson have built monolithic pandemic preparedness structures. Billions of dollars are now dedicated to perfecting the highly profitable processes they hope will ensure the perception of perpetual pandemic threats upon humanity.
We are required to believe what we are told and to question none of it. Covid has shown us the carnage that results from obedience to this burgeoning global biosecurity regime: villains become saviours, lies become truth, a mass casualty event from injecting billions becomes “staying safe”.
Documented Corruption of the Scientific Method
Science is a methodical process of discovery looking for cause and effect relationships between variables and outcomes. The primary step of the scientific method is observation, followed by investigation into what may have caused the phenomenon that has been observed, or a specific effect that may have resulted from the observed phenomenon.
A hypothesis is developed and tested. An outcome will either support or falsify the hypothesis. All possible variables should be considered in order to remove or reduce any biases which can lead to flawed conclusions. The experiment is repeated to confirm the initial outcome, removing the possibility that it occurred by chance.
When the same experiment conducted in the same way by different scientists brings about the same results, then it can be considered accurate. Known as replication, this is regarded as the gold standard of science. A well known paradox of science is the “replication crisis” in which up to two thirds of experiments cannot be replicated, as initial observations are often inconclusive.
Second in line to the gold standard of replication is the process of peer review, which is supposed to provide external validation of research papers. Subject matter experts evaluate the quality of a research paper to ensure it reaches minimum standards and is therefore considered credible enough for publication.
Various prestigious medical journal editors have decried the control that pharmaceutical companies have over the flow of medical information. They agree especially that peer review has been corrupted by industry influence and conflicts of interest. Between 2020 and 2022 the pharmaceutical industry paid over US$1 billion to peer reviewers at the four highest impact medical journals (British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet, and The New England Journal of Medicine). In 2022 a BMJ Editorial argued, in the face of Pfizer refusing to share the raw data from their covid vaccine clinical trials – needed for peer review – that “Pharmaceutical companies are reaping vast profits without adequate independent scrutiny of their scientific claims“.
Mathematical models are often used in scientific research to predict and describe real-world phenomena. They are easily abused by embedding erroneous assumptions into the model. For example, published in March 2020, Ferguson’s covid modeling assumed an infection fatality rate of 0.9%. As early as April 2020 seroprevalence studies showed the infection fatality rate to be “close to that of a severe influenza season (<0.2%)“, and in fact miniscule for younger demographics.
Ferguson also estimated effectiveness of mitigation measures which he recommended to the UK government, and which were subsequently implemented across the globe, such as quarantine of the healthy, school and business closures, and social distancing. His main evidence came from claims made by the Chinese Communist Party who are closely associated with his employer, Imperial College London.
Economics Professor Richard Werner describes the origins and abuses of mathematical modeling in this six minute clip from a recent interview with Tucker Carlson.
Invisibility Allows for Deceit
Listed by UNESCO as a world heritage territory of Australia, Heard Island is protected by “strict visitation and quarantine controls to maintain natural conditions and ecological integrity, and to prevent the introduction of pathogens and non-native species.” By their own criteria, they have already failed their mandate as Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Centre for Disease Preparedness claims that six species have now “tested positive“ for Influenza A H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b. Evidence suggests this clade is the result of gain of function research.
Since at least 2016 senior scientist at the Australian Antarctic Division and ecology PhD candidate at Adelaide University, Jarrod Hodgson has been experimenting with the use of drones and other technologies for animal surveillance research. Referencing dead elephant seal pups on Heard Island in an interview with ABC TV on 20 June 2026 he stated “mortality was around 76%. And that equates to over 13,000 dead pups“. In this obvious sleight of hand he does not state the actual number observed, which was then extrapolated mathematically to the entire estimated population.
The 18 June 2026 media release by the Australian Antarctic Program even admits, in relation to the seal pup mortality they observed, that “due to the remoteness and protected status, no on-ground sampling was undertaken, meaning laboratory confirmation was not possible.” It is therefore unknown as to whether 13,000 seal pups really did die, and if so, what their cause of death was.
Other gaps in the story include no provision of context, eg what is the expected mortality of seal pups at that location and that time of year? How does drone footage differentiate between a sleeping pup and a dead corpse? Why were all of the observed deaths only in pups and not in the adult population? What other possible causes of death have been considered and/or excluded? What was the methodology of this observational research?
Scientists not connected to the Australian Antarctic Program have no way of checking any of their claims due to the protected status of Heard Island. In his 2021 publication Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom, ecologist and Greenpeace co-founder Dr Patrick Moore describes this phenomenon articulately. He is referencing climate change, which as climate scientist Judith Curry has explained, saw scientists speaking against the narrative silenced and attacked long before the extreme experiences of so many who dared speak out during the covid era.
… the great majority of scare stories about the present and future state of the planet, and humanity as a whole, are based on subjects that are either invisible, like CO2 and radiation, or extremely remote, like polar bears and coral reefs. Thus, the vast majority of people have no way of observing and verifying for themselves the truth of these claims predicting these alleged catastrophes and devastating threats. Instead, they must rely on the activists, the media, the politicians, and the scientists – all of whom have a very large financial and/or political stake in the subject – to tell them the truth. This welcomes the opportunity to simply invent narratives …
When one studies these “narratives” of invisible and remote circumstances, it is hard to avoid noticing that the purveyors often stoop to ridiculing and shaming … It is virtually impossible to engage in debate as they usually dismiss those who question their narrative as a skeptic, liar, denier, or being in the pocket of “big oil”. And if the alleged skeptic has employment, those narrators will work underhandedly to have you removed from your livelihood or position. In summary, these purveyors of global environmental catastrophes are definitely a scurrilous and dishonest lot. Healthy skepticism is at the very heart of scientific inquiry, and it has played an integral role in determining factual scientific truth. It is the duty of scientists to be skeptical of all new claims, especially when they are predictions of catastrophes that have not yet occurred.
Industry Interests Producing Pandemics
That the CSIRO have a Centre for Disease Preparedness is in itself of concern, given their association with coronavirus gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology as far back as 2010. In 2022, as part of their “Infectious Disease Resilience Mission”, the Centre for Disease Preparedness published Australia’s first Pandemic Preparedness Report which calls for more gain of function research and expansion of vaccines development.
The dangers and barbarity of gain of function research are well documented (see here and here), as are the connections between gain of function research and bird flu (see here). The only reasons we can think of for anyone to be calling for an increase in this nefarious activity, must be either financial or political and certainly do not relate to human health.
Language such as “investment” and “costs” suggests financial motivations posing as public health. This is no surprise given that the Infectious Disease Resilience Mission appears to be a public-private partnership with unnamed corporate partners. They deceitfully claim a 300% increase in outbreaks over the past 30 years, which is most likely the result of more surveillance, testing and biomedical assessment. Claims that increased risk of infectious disease are occurring at a time when living standards in western nations have been higher than at any time in recorded history make no sense.
The same assertions of increased risk are made by the World Health Organization, World Bank and G20. These entities are all invested in the multi billion dollar Financial Intermediary Fund (FIF) for Pandemic Preparedness and Response (PPR). As we warned two years ago, this architecture intends to channel public funds through corporate coffers in the name of One Health – surely the largest and most grotesque money laundering project ever concocted.
New Zealand’s institutions are being primed to participate in the local implementation of this global agenda. See our May 2026 article on the indoctrination taking place at Ministry for Primary Industries and across our local councils. Also see our June 2026 article World Health Organization Collaborating Centres Ensuring Local Implementation of Global Agenda.
Independent researcher Clare Swinney spoke to Liz Gunn recently about the documented evidence of plans to cull poultry and livestock. The usual clairvoyants are promoting the alleged need for bird flu pandemic “preparations”.
To our eyes and ears this looks like a threat to our food supply wrapped up in another panic-demic. It will be harder to protect our kids from this one. Do not be fooled, and find your own way to let the purveyors of this anti-human agenda know that everything they say and do is being scrutinised and recorded.
More Information
Learn more at the following links:
Jodie Bruning, 1 May 2026 Don’t Make Bird Flu a Plucking Disaster. Jodie details the threat posed to New Zealand farmers and our food supply.
Clare Swinney, 23 March 2026 NZ’s Public Sector Methodically Pre-conditioned To Expect Bird Flu Pandemic, One Following The COVID-19 Blueprint. Clare provides the evidence of local implementations that are underway to alter the fabric of our society.
Nicolas Hulscher, 7 January 2026 Interview discussing evidence of gain of function research creating H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b.
alicespringstomind 