Hiding and Lying: Pfizer in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding

The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) is an American non-profit organisation involved in investigating the safety of medical procedures and products, with a focus on protecting the public’s right to informed consent. ICAN are represented by lawyers who brought the case against the FDA who had requested to keep the Pfizer trial documents suppressed from public view for 75 years. ICAN won the law suit and these documents continue to be released, including 52 PDF documents in the April 2023 “document dump”.

All of the documents are uploaded at Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT). Most of the documents consist of tens of thousands of pages of raw data which noone could easily make sense of. Dr Naomi Wolf, recognising safety signals occurring in the population following the vaccine program rollout, put a call-out for assistance to analyse the data and ultimately 3,500 relevantly trained people volunteered to assist. She then arranged coordinators who set up teams, who have been analysing the data and reporting their findings via Daily Clout. Click on the red button, “Read the Latest Pfizer Reports”.

Meanwhile, the April document release was reported on by ICAN yesterday. The first report mentioned is an 8-page Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review taken from Pfizer/BioNTech’s safety database, of relevant cases reported until 28 February 2021. The product was not authorised for use in pregnancy at this time, but these women were vaccinated prior to knowing they were pregnant, or I assume in error.

Reports to this database are voluntary, meaning it is a passive monitoring system with an unknown magnitude of under-reporting. The actual incidence rates of specific adverse events cannot be known via this mechanism, but cases of harm following (not necessarily caused by) administration of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 “Comirnaty” injection would, under normal circumstances, lead to a halt of the program whilst cases were followed up and investigated to exclude the possibility of medical harm.

The Pfizer report shows terrible harm and death. For this to be ignored and denied is unfathomable. Particularly when it is known that the lipid nanoparticles, transporting the mRNA which tells the body to make spike protein, biodistribute throughout the body and accumulate in the liver, spleen, adrenal glands, lymph nodes and in women, the ovaries. The lipid nanoparticles also traverse the placenta and whistleblowers are speaking out about the harms being seen in unborn babies of vaccinated women.

According to Dr Wolf, Pfizer’s documents show 43,000 adverse events, 72% of which occurred in women and 16% of those are defined by Pfizer as “reproductive disorders”. Clotting events (probably due to a range of mechanisms but including accumulation of solidified lipid nanoparticles) and neurological disorders (caused by degradation of the myelin sheath) are occurring “at industrial scale” following vaccination. Auto immune conditions are being seen, including arthritis, joint and muscle inflammation as the body attacks itself as the spike protein expresses onto the surface of the cell. The third most common side effect of Pfizer’s “vaccine” is Covid. Which is hardly surprising as the product tells the body to produce spike protein, and affects the immune system’s capacity to respond in multiple ways.

Dr Wolf speaks about the Pfizer documents analysis project frequently. Most recently with Dr Drew and Dr Victory, here (starts at 5 minutes). Among other scandalous information, at around 13 minutes she describes the experience of trying to engage with Viki Male, an “immunologist working on pregnancy” at Imperial College in London and engaging in “junk science”.

Male’s father is a biology professor who holds a patent for nanoparticle delivery systems and Imperial College are the recipient of $302 million in Gates Foundation sponsorship, suggesting extremely strong conflicts of interest. Male appears to be employed to use her status as a researcher, to convince the general public that these experimental products are safe in pregnancy, contradicting the clinical trial evidence and now, also the real world evidence. Read more at A miscarriage of statistics: The thalidomide sequel, Proof that the miscarriage rate after the COVID vaccines is far higher than the real background rate and how the pharma corporations tried to hide it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s