alicespringstomind

Dr Dan Stock stood up in front of the Mt Vernon School Board Meeting in Indiana USA yesterday to articulate, as yet another expert in public health matters speaking out against official, political-profiteer-driven and harmful interventions, the following basic, honest and sound public health science. Already at 123,000 views, YouTube will remove it once it reaches the 500,000 mark in order to “protect us”, so I’ve transcribed his words for posterity. (UPDATE: YouTube removed it within a few hours. I’ve updated to a Bitchute link).

It’s hard to believe we are eighteen months into this and still having a problem. I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we are doing things that are not useful, and we are getting our information from the Indiana State Board of Health and the CDC, who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this.

I’m actually a functional Family Medicine Physician. That means I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation. And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.

So the things you should know about Coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses. They are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask. By the way the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we presented to you and has been given to the secretary. As a matter of fact, it quotes at least three studies sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they pay to have done.

That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long, waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter, or become deranged, as has happened recently with these vaccines, and then they cause symptomatic disease. Because they cannot be filtered out, and they have animal reservoirs. And this is a very important point.

Noone can make this virus go away.

The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we handled Smallpox, where we could make a virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we were able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this, anymore than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes, or anything else that has animal reservoirs.

So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and cannot be done.

Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine. And I would hope that this board would start asking itself, before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH and the State Board of Health, why we are doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncytial virus? And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective, having a breakout in the middle of the summer, when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that?

To help you understand that you need to know the condition that is called Antibody Mediated Viral Enhancement. That is a condition done when vaccines went wrong, as they did with every Coronavirus study done in animals, on Coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak, and done in respiratory syncytial virus. Where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which by the way cannot be done right for a respiratory virus which has a very low pathogenicity rate, causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong, and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection.

That is why you are seeing an outbreak right now, and in fact in that flash drive coming to you and in the emails with six extra studies showing that 75% of people who had Covid-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable Massachussetts outbreak, were fully vaccinated.

Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated.

You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones I support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection. In 2014 there was an outbreak of Mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down with symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status. Boy that sounds like a great argument for vaccines. But a question you should ask yourself, knowing that half the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual. Where did they get the disease? The answer was from the vaccinated individuals.

No vaccine prevents you from getting an infection. You get infected, you shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogen. You just don’t get symptomatic from it. So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you planned on get better by doing any of the things you are doing. Because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens.

And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do the very thing you are wanting them to do. And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognise that the Centre for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance.

Instead read the articles that are coming in the email and on this flash drive, and listen to the people in this audience here tonight, who actually have recognised that the advice they are getting from the CDC and NIH is counter-factual. And that’s why you’re still fighting this.

This vaccine was supposedly going to make all of this go away, but it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of Covid-19 develop in the middle of the summer, when Vitamin D levels are at their highest.

By the way, the other thing for any vaccine restriction to be considered would be if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having treated over 15 Covid-19 patients, that between active loading with Vitamin D, Ivermectin and Zinc, that there is not a single person that has come anywhere near the hospital, and we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 Hydroxy-D level greater than 55, your risk of Covid-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States. And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that show the same is true.

So if you are going to discriminate based on vaccine, you should also discriminate based on 25 Hydroxy-D level, Zinc taste test response, and probably previous infection since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from Covid-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all. No reduction of symptoms, no reduction of hospitalisation. And suffer 2 to 4 times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.

Therefore the policies you are basing on are totally counterfactual.

I don’t blame this board for that as I know you aren’t scientists and you thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of Health. But I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what’s on that data drive. And if anybody here on this board has any questions about anything on that I will happily come back and sit with you individually, if you would like me to explain the science behind this. And if you are worried about being sued by somebody because you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and NIH, I will tell you, you have a free pro bono expert testimony at your disposal. I will testify in defence of this board turning down all of these recommendations. For free, at any time, at any court. Thank you.

This was also a very interesting interview with a UK based lawyer who, based on expert advice, has made an urgent application to the European Criminal Court regarding the illegality of Covid-19 experimental vaccine rollout in UK. She states these meet the definition of medical devices, rather than medications and the question of legality covers several different areas of law, around manipulation of data, availability of safe alternative treatments, and other information which is suppressed by mainstream media.