Owning Fear and Fact Checks

In the days when pharmacovigilance was not labelled “anti-vax”, fifteen injuries associated with a vaccination saw the relevant vaccine withdrawn from market. This is a single example of many through the history of vaccinations. Public health governed pharmaceutical products. That practice has since been inverted.

Laura Dodsworth authored Sunday Times bestseller The State of Fear: how the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic.

She spoke on talkRADIO yesterday about the Nudge Unit, a taxpayer-funded team of behavioural scientists who are now a limited company, whose role is to ensure public compliance with “tricky public policies”. The UK government’s “Net Zero” plan, another World Economic Forum gift to society likely to have Lysenko-level outcomes, will involve meat taxes, the introduction of plant based foods in schools, prisons, government buildings and hospitals, and taxes on frequent flying. The Nudge Unit’s role is working out ways to ensure compliance with the plan.

The use of fear is how they get us to conform“.

There is no doubt that most locking-down nations have some version of a Nudge Unit.

Only fear and coercion would convince young people, at negligible risk of harm from Covid-19, to risk their health trying to prevent it. The above data is selected from the Australian government’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN). Sixty four reported cases of heart injury to Australian youth in a ten day period (1 October to 10 October, 2021) following a single vaccine administration. This excludes all other injuries of the 1,306 total reports for the same period which include, for example, 18 cases of Bell’s Palsy; 2 cases of deafness; 1 case of blindness; 1 stroke (CVA) and multiple other injuries as per the link.

Reports from frontline workers are that many more vaccine associated injuries go unreported due to fear of de-registration or dismissal should they be determined as holding “anti-vax” views by employers or licensing authorities. Previously, the deliberate non-reporting of adverse events associated with a medical intervention had enormous professional ethical ramifications. The first principle in public health, to “first do no harm” is now distorted.

Journalist Sharyl Attkisson presented this three minute report for CBS in 2008 regarding conflicts of interest between the vaccine industry and so-called “independent” public health experts and institutions. Earlier this year she discussed her book “Slanted: How the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism” at this interview on American Thought Leaders, outlining changes in mainstream media, proliferation of third party “fact checkers”, and Big Tech’s control of online discourse.

“Public health” now equates to adhering strictly to pharmaceutical industry requirements including unquestioning worship of anything which is named “vaccine”. Human beings are not biologically dependent on pharmaceutical products for health. Rather, the pharmaceutical industry is financially dependent on human beings for survival. And they have devised a way to thrive.

If you Google this claim a number of “fact checks” will correct it. Yet Pfizer’s 2021 Second Quarter report states:

One thought on “Owning Fear and Fact Checks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s