Principles Over Careers

Karen Nagle and Sarah Choujounian are Canadian nurses who lost their jobs after speaking out against the medical corruption they have witnessed in the pandemic response. They started Global Frontline Nurses which has united nurses globally, with nurses from as far away as Ireland and Australia joining them. The intent of this group is to fight for medical transparency, informed consent, sovereignty and human rights which are being stripped from us all.

In this interview with Bright Light News, they discuss multiple points which I have been blogging about for months. These women worked as Registered Nurses for many years before suddenly becoming unemployed activists. These are neither conspiracists nor troublemakers, they are principled professionals fighting for what is right.

Some of the main points in the interview are:

Keeping people in a state of fear maintains illogical responses, as is being seen en masse around the world.

Allowing people the chance to care for their own health would keep people out of hospital, but instead lockdowns keep people locked indoors, restricting physical activity and social activity, all of which reduce health.

Isolation suppresses immune systems, it does not protect them; we are not sterile beings, we need to be exposed to bacteria and viruses to maintain good health. We are being told otherwise, which makes no biological sense and makes us weaker and sicker.

The pharmaceutical industry run on a sickness model. Hypochondria and germophobia are now being encouraged via over-sanitising and reducing our exposure to germs. (There is no doubt that the pharmaceutical industry are both driving and benefiting enormously from, lockdown policies).

Working at long term care homes for most of her nursing career, Sarah states she did not observe an excess of death. She has observed however, that old people are no longer dying of the flu, pneumonia or old age. The focus now, is Covid. Treating people as Covid cases when in fact it may be something else, eg bacterial pneumonia, means some people may be dying without treatments which could save their lives.

The differences between dying “with Covid” and dying “from Covid” are not made even when people have other conditions which are clearly their actual cause of death.

The media have twisted a story about bodies piling up in freezer trucks, suggesting an excess of death being experienced. In fact, bodies are left in morgues for longer than usual as a consequance of lockdowns, as families wait to hold funerals, leading to more bodies in storage than usual. Funeral directors are reporting the same phenomenon. (Dr Clare Craig talked at length about the way that multiple data points are misconstrued in the UK, in her interview with Alex McCarron. It is complicated, but worth trying to understand).

People repeatedly testing negative for Covid have been described as “Covid Confirmed” (a phenomenon that lawyer Clare Wills has described as occurring in the UK also, as per her interview here with Alex McCarron).

Be informed. Don’t only hear one side of the story. Be confident and not fearful, decisions based on fear are not the best decisions.

Seniors want quality of life, not survival at any cost. They want to be close to their loved ones and they should have a choice about this instead of being forcibly isolated during their final precious months of life.

On Monday, March 29, 2021 Alberta’s Multidisciplinary Team of David Redman, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Dr. Dennis Modry and David Dickson extended an invitation to Premier Kenney, the COVID-19 response team, including Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Deena Hinshaw, and Minister of Health Tyler Shandro, to participate in a public forum, an academic debate, to discuss the Alberta Government’s response to the pandemic.

The invitation was to engage in a transparent public discussion on behalf of Albertans regarding:

  • The actual danger of SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 by age group;
  • Identification and review of the Alberta Government’s pandemic respons team’s supporting science, data and testing methodology that are being utilised to justify lockdowns adn public health orders;
  • The absense of an Emergency Management process, resulting in the absence of due diligence required in an emergency;
  • The effectiveness and relevance of lockdowns and restrictions;
  • How to shift the fear? That the risk from the virus is not at all proportionate to the massive societal harms caused by the lockdowns and public health orders.

Given that the deadline of Monday, April 6th to engage in debate has expired, and given the unprecedented decision of returning to Stage 1, the press conference is intended to draw the public’s attention to a counter-narrative that vigorously opposes the Government’s current position.

For over a year, the Alberta Government has imposed arbitrary restrictions on the rights and freedoms of the people of Alberta, resulting in unnecessary death of our beloved seniors, causing collateral damage to society, be that mental health, physical health, social health, children’s mental, physical and development health and wellbeing, limited access to healthcare, and devastating many businesses, small and large, across Alberta. The inhumane treatment of the people of Alberta must end.

The press conference can be viewed at this link. It includes an excellent presentation by Dr Rodger Hodkinson whose motives are completely opposite to the massive corporate profits driving an insane, aggressive and incredibly harmful pandemic response. Near the end of his distinguished career, Hodkinson has nothing to gain and much to lose by speaking out on this. Threats to professional licences, employment, tenures and research grants lead to many others who would speak out, remaining silent. There is also a contingent of arrogant and braggardly academics and public health professionals who don’t even try to hide their links to Big Pharma and Big Philanthropy funding whilst promoting lockdowns and restrictions on society as if these have any merit in public health. These are important considerations when trying to work out who to believe about what constitutes genuine public health.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s